U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Oechsle

United States v. Oechsle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 1999

United States v. Oechsle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RAYMOND THOMAS OECHSLE, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-57, CA-97-892-5-BO)

Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Oechsle, Nos. CR-94-57; CA-97-892-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 10, 1998). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.