United States v. Shores
United States v. Shores
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7239
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
FRED SHORES, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-49, CA-97-146-5-MU)
Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999
Before WIDENER,* MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fred Shores, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
* Judge Widener did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Fred Shores, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Shores, Nos. CR-90-49; CA-97-146-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.