Perez-Perez v. Floyd

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Perez-Perez v. Floyd

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7442

CRECENCIO PEREZ-PEREZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

C. E. FLOYD, Warden; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3742-0-06-BD)

Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 26, 1999

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior District Court.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crecencio Perez-Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Crecencio Perez-Perez appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Perez-Perez v. Floyd, No. CA-97-3742-0-06-BD (D.S.C.

Sept. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished