McDonald v. Dante Coal Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McDonald v. Dante Coal Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2635

VIRGINIA MCDONALD,

Petitioner,

versus

DANTE COAL COMPANY (Badger Coal Company); DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRO- GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-2029-BLA)

Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Daniel Blizzard, II, SHAFFER & SHAFFER, Madison, West Vir- ginia, for Petitioner. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, J. Matthew McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Virginia McDonald seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to

30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945

(West

1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. McDonald v. Dante Coal Company, BRB No. 95-2029-BLA (B.R.B.

Sept. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished