Turner v. Thompson
Turner v. Thompson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6993
LAWRENCE TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. E. THOMPSON, Warden, Staunton Correctional Center; FAYE W. MCCAULEY, Operations Office, Staunton Correctional Center; J. R. FLOYD, Property Control Officer, Staunton Correction- al Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-563-R)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assis- tant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Turner appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. We deny Turner’s motion to consolidate this
appeal with appeal number 98-6904, and affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Turner v. Thompson, No. CA-96-563-R (W.D.
Va. June 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished