Taylor v. Wall
Taylor v. Wall
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2321
KATHLEEN A. TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CYNTHIA WALL, Individually and as a member of the faculty of the University of Virginia De- partment of English; GORDON BRADEN, Individu- ally and in his capacity as a member of the faculty and as Chair of the University of Vir- ginia Department of English; PATRICIA SPACKS, Individually and in her capacity as Chair of the English Department at the University of Virginia; JOHN CASTEEN, Individually and in his capacity as President of the University of Virginia; PETER W. LOW, Individually and in his capacity as Vice President and Provost of the University of Virginia; ROBERT HUSKEY, Individually and in his capacity as Associate Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Science of the University of Virginia; MELVYN LEFFLER, Individually and in his capacity as Dean of Faculty of the University of Virginia; KAREN HOLT, Individually and in her capacity as Equal Opportunity Programs Officer at the University of Virginia; RICHARD RILEY, Indi- vidually and in his capacity as Secretary of Education at the United States Department of Education; NORMA CANTU, Individually and in her capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education; JANETTE LIM, Individually and in her capacity as Director, Program Legal Com- ponent, Office for Civil Rights, United States Department of Education; FOUR UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS, Individually and in their capacity as police officers for the University of Virginia and/or the City of Charlottesville; BARBARA MELOSH; ROSEMARY JANN, Individually and in their capacities as Co-Chairs, George Mason University English Department; RONALD J. SINACORE, Individually and in his capacity as Affirmative Action Planning Coordinator for George Mason University; EARL J. INGRAM, Indi- vidually and in his capacity as Vice President and Equity Officer for George Mason Univer- sity; CLAIRE KINNEY; SUSAN FRAIMAN; KATHERINE MAUS, Individually and in their capacities as members of the faculty of the University of Virginia Department of English,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-235-R)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 5, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathleen A. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Kathleen A. Taylor appeals from the district court’s order
directing her to advise the court whether she intended for the
documents she filed on August 13, 1998, to serve as a response to
the district court’s August 10, 1998, order or as a notice of
appeal from that order. We dismiss the appeal for lack of juris-
diction because the order is not appealable. This court may exer-
cise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(1994),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp.,
337 U.S. 541(1949). The order here appealed is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished