Dedes v. Virginia State Bar
Dedes v. Virginia State Bar
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2041
CHRISTOS D. DEDES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA STATE BAR; JANE ALLEN FLETCHER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (MISC 98-11-3)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christos D. Dedes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Christos D. Dedes appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing this action for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Dedes v. Virginia State
Bar, No. MISC 98-11-3 (E.D. Va. July 16, 1998).* We deny leave to
appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on July 2, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on July 16, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished