Burnette v. Signet/Capital One
Burnette v. Signet/Capital One
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2242
RAMONA S. BURNETTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SIGNET/CAPITAL ONE BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-865-3)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING,* Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramona S. Burnette, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Nicholas Regnery, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, Richmond, Virginia; Bruin S. Richardson, III, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia for Appellee.
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ramona Burnette appeals the district court’s order awarding
costs to the Defendant and dismissing as barred by the statute of
limitations her complaint in which she alleged bankruptcy discrim-
ination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Burnette v. Signet/
Capital One, No. CA-97-865-3 (E.D. Va. July 20, 1998). Addition-
ally, we deny Capital One’s and Signet’s motions for sanctions. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished