Barnes v. Hulsey
Barnes v. Hulsey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2194
E. YVETTE BARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL H. HULSEY, Esq.,
Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD HAYHURST,
Third Party Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-96-2939-23-2)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
E. Yvette Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pedrick McWilliams, NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS & POLLARD, Columbia, South Carolina; James Edward Holler, HOLLER, DENNIS, CORBETT, GARNER & ORMOND, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
E. Yvette Barnes appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Paul H. Hulsey in her diversity action in which
she raised claims of legal malpractice, fraud, and intentional
infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.* Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Barnes v. Hulsey, No. CA-96-2939-23-2 (D.S.C. July 10, 1998). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* In her informal brief, Barnes explicitly has abandoned on appeal her claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished