U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Davis

United States v. Davis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 1999

United States v. Davis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

REGINALD DAVIS, a/k/a Sinbad, a/k/a Reggie, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-25, CA-97-382-R)

Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Reginald Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-93-25; CA- 97-382-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.