U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Osborne v. Island Creek Coal Co

Osborne v. Island Creek Coal Co
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 1999

Osborne v. Island Creek Coal Co

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1956

PAUL E. OSBORNE, Petitioner, versus

ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (97-1341-BLA)

Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul E. Osborne, Petitioner Pro Se. Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; Christian P. Barber, Helen Hart Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Paul E. Osborne seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s decision denying his request under 20 C.F.R. 725.310 (1998) for modification of a prior denial of his application for black lung benefits. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

See Osborne v. Island Creek Coal Co., BRB No. 97-1341-BLA (B.R.B.

Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.