United States v. Latham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Latham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES LATHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-28, CA-98-511-R)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Charles Latham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Christopher Charles Latham seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Latham,

Nos. CR-94-28; CA-98-511-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 13, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished