U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Benavides

United States v. Benavides
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 9, 1999

United States v. Benavides

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ARNULFO D. BENAVIDES, a/k/a Arnold, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-92-67, CA-97-92-4)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnulfo D. Benavides, Appellant Pro Se. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Arnulfo D. Benavides seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See United States v. Benavides, Nos. CR-92-67; CA-97-92-4 (E.D. Va. July 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.