U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Reed v. Drew

Reed v. Drew
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 9, 1999

Reed v. Drew

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7142

STEVEN J. REED, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

FRANK DREW, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILKIE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-4-3)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven J. Reed, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Steven J. Reed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recom- mendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Drew, No. CA-98- 4-3 (E.D. Va. July 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.