Gibbs v. Moore
Gibbs v. Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7543
JOSEPH HUGO GIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL W. MOORE; DOUG CATOE; WALDO PEARSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1504)
Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Hugo Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Malloy McEachin, Jr., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Joseph Hugo Gibbs appeals three district court orders, the
first affirming a magistrate judge’s order denying Gibbs’ motion to
compel and motion for sanctions in Gibbs’ action filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998), the second a district court
order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
Defendants summary judgment in the action, and the third a district
court order denying his motion for a new trial and motion to amend
the order granting Defendants summary judgment. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Gibbs v. Moore, No. CA-97-1504 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1998).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished