UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2638

EDGAR MICHAEL PORTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NATIONAL CON-SERV, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-4005-JFM)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Michael Porter, Appellant Pro Se. John Marshall, MOLDAWER & MARSHALL, Rockville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Edgar Porter appeals the district court’s order granting sum- mary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing Porter’s complaint brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Porter v. National Con-Serv, Inc., No. CA-96-4005-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED