Porter v. National Con-Serv

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 17, 1999

Opinion

No. 98-2638

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-4005-JFM)

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edgar Michael Porter, Appellant Pro Se. John Marshall, MOLDAWER & MARSHALL, Rockville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edgar Porter appeals the district court’s order granting sum-

mary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing Porter’s complaint

brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Porter v. National Con-Serv, Inc., No. CA-96-4005-JFM

(D. Md. Oct. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.