United States v. Carr
United States v. Carr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7624
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES E. CARR, a/k/a Jimbo, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-66, CA-97-916-2)
Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999
Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: James E. Carr appeals a district court’s order dismissing one his claims under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1998) but ordering a hearing with regard to a second claim. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable inter- locutory or collateral order.
We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We also deny Carr’s motion for copies of tran- scripts, lab reports, and other items. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.