Maxwell v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 24, 1999

Opinion

No. 98-7330

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-98-580-5)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s order dis-

missing his action seeking return of property under Fed. R. Crim.

P. 41(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Maxwell’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis, but affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Maxwell, No. CA-98-580-5

(S.D.W. Va. Aug. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.