Ring v. Stump
Ring v. Stump
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2545
WARREN R. RING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. ROBERT STUMP, Chief Judge, 30th Circuit, Commonwealth of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-98-119-B)
Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999
Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren R. Ring, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Meade Macon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Warren Ring appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
civil suit filed against a state court judge for actions allegedly
committed by the judge during the course of Ring’s criminal trial.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Ring v. Stump, No. CA-98-119-B (W.D.
Va. Oct. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished