Britt v. Martin
Britt v. Martin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2492
CLARENCE BRITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PERRY WHITEHEAD MARTIN, SR.; JACK BENJAMIN CRAWLEY, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-1007-5-H)
Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999
Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Britt, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Ray Wooten, WARD & SMITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina; Jack Benjamin Crawley, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF JACK B. CRAWLEY, JR., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Clarence Britt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his civil diversity complaint as time-barred and denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. See Britt v. Martin,
No. CA-97-1007-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 30; Sept. 10, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished