Alexander v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Alexander v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7037

JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Director; COLIE L. RUSHTON; LEROY CARTLEDGE, Major; D. MCTAGGER, Captain; P. JONES, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2598-6-20AK)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Douglas Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., CLARKSON, FORTSON, WALSH & RHENEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Alexander v. Moore, No. CA-97-2598-6-20AK (D.S.C. June 18, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished