Alexander v. Doe
Alexander v. Doe
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7233
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE, Republic Tobacco Company; JOHN DOE, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2786-6-20)
Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999
Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Douglas Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. William Alexander Coates, LOVE, THORNTON, ARNOLD & THOMASON, Greenville, South Caro- lina; Lewis Walter Tollison, III, Rivers Samuel Stilwell, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John Douglas Alexander appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Alexander v. Doe, No. CA-97-2786-6-20 (D.S.C.
July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished