U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Sosa

United States v. Sosa
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1999

United States v. Sosa

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7729

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

FRANCISCO MORENO SOSA, a/k/a Sld Dft 1, a/k/a Alex Poncho, a/k/a Franko Hernandez, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-96-48)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francisco Moreno Sosa, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Francisco Moreno Sosa appeals the district court’s order de- nying his motion for court-appointed counsel and investigative and expert witnesses to aid in the preparation of a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sosa, No. CR-96-48 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1998). We deny Sosa’s motion for the apppointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.