U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Rinehart v. Brewer

Rinehart v. Brewer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 1999

Rinehart v. Brewer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7828

JEAN-CLAUDE RINEHART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JOEL H. BREWER, Person County District At- torney; PERSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; GAIL SHULL, Detective, Person County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-713-1)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jean-Claude Rinehart, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Keith David Burns, FAISON & GILLESPIE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jean-Claude Rinehart appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rinehart v. Brewer, No. CA-97-713-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.