U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Sandidge

United States v. Sandidge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 9, 1999

United States v. Sandidge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

BRYANT PAIGE SANDIDGE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-105, CA-97-195-R)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 9, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Paige Sandidge, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, As- sistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Bryant Paige Sandidge appeals the district court’s order deny- ing his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sandidge, Nos. CR-95- 105; CA-97-195-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.