U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

McGibboney v. Attorney General NC

McGibboney v. Attorney General NC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 8, 1999

McGibboney v. Attorney General NC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7188

JOE WESLEY MCGIBBONEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-98-88-1)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Wesley McGibboney, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Joe Wesley McGibboney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appeal- ability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See McGibboney v. Attorney General of North Carolina, No. CA-98-88-1 (M.D.N.C. July 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.