U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Cepeda v. FBI

Cepeda v. FBI
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 1999

Cepeda v. FBI

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7722

FAUSTO CEPEDA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN R. HEALEY, Police Officer; PAUL V. KING, JR., Chief, Unit of Forfeiture and Seized Property Finance Division, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-608-3)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fausto Cepeda, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Fausto Cepeda appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Cepeda has failed to adequately present any issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

See 4th Cir. Local R. 34(b). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.