Snell v. Rich
Snell v. Rich
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7574
EMORY G. SNELL, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LESTER RICH, Special Agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Charleston Divi- sion, and others as yet unknown, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-3422-5-11JI)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emory G. Snell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Caro- lina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Emory G. Snell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Snell v. Rich, No. CA-96-3422-5-11JI (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1998). We deny Snell’s four motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court properly construed Snell’s complaint as one filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.