UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1050

ROBERT E. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

SUSAN M. JONES, Plaintiff, versus

MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-2-3)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert E. Jones and Susan M. Jones appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant summary judgment on their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Runyon, No. CA- 98-2-3 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 11, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s memorandum and order is marked as “filed” on December 10, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on December 11, 1998.

Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the memorandum and order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).