U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Parrish

United States v. Parrish
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 22, 1999

United States v. Parrish

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7598

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JOHN F. PARRISH, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-124, CA-98-298-2)

Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John F. Parrish, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John F. Parrish, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 and Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Parrish, Nos. CR-96-124; CA-98-298-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 26, 1998). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.