Reynolds v. Fairfax Cnty Public
Reynolds v. Fairfax Cnty Public
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2207
OLLYE TINE SNOW REYNOLDS; BOBBY O. REYNOLDS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus
FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; THE FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; ROBERT SPILLANE, Former Superintendent; ALLEN LEIS, Former Director of Personnel, then Deputy Superintendent, now Interim Superintendent, Fairfax County Public School System (as employees and individuals); LOUDOUN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MANASSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; FALLS CHURCH CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; ARLINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendants - Appellees, and
SAINT MARY’S COLLEGE, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1592-A)
Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds, Bobby O. Reynolds, Appellants Pro Se.
John Francis Cafferky, Ingo Frank Burghardt, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, McLean, Virginia; Richard Mark Dare, Merrell B. Renaud, HAZEL & THOMAS, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia; Martin Ritchie Crim, SMITH & DAVENPORT, Manassas, Virginia; Carol Winfield McCoskrie, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds and Bobby O. Reynolds appeal the dis- trict court’s order dismissing this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, because the Plaintiffs failed to state a claim, we affirm. See Reynolds v. Fairfax County Pub. Schs., No. CA-97-1592- A (E.D. Va. July 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.