U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Breathwaite v. Hinkle

Breathwaite v. Hinkle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 1999

Breathwaite v. Hinkle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6068

WAYNE ALLEN BREATHWAITE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

G. M. HINKLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-538-3)

Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Allen Breathwaite, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Wayne Allen Breathwaite appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Breathwaite v. Hinkle, No. CA- 98-538-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1998). We also deny Breathwaite’s motion to amend proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.