U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Allen v. Coker College

Allen v. Coker College
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 30, 1999

Allen v. Coker College

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2818

DALLICE M. ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

COKER COLLEGE; HAL LEWIS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-2480-4-10BD)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dallice M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Augustus Dunlap, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Dallice M. Allen appeals from the district court’s order deny- ing relief in her civil action in which she alleged that the Defendants, in retaliation for her previous lawsuit against Coker College, sent a financial aid transcript containing a defamatory statement to the University of South Carolina. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magis- trate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Coker College, No. CA-96-2480-4-10BD (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.