U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Teague v. Time Warner

Teague v. Time Warner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1999

Teague v. Time Warner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1266

ROY W. TEAGUE, d/b/a Myers/Chavis Utility Con- tractors, a resident of Cumberland County, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

GARY L. CHAVIS, d/b/a Myers/Chavis Utility Contractors, a resident of Davidson County, Plaintiff, versus

TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware corporation; TIME WARNER CABLE, AN ADVANCED NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-510-5-F)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 23, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON,* Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy W. Teague, Appellant Pro Se. Reid L. Phillips, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Roy Teague appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to set aside the summary judgment order in favor of Defen- dants. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Teague v. Time Warner, No. CA-98-510-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Judge Hamilton did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.