U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Walters v. Lovelace

Walters v. Lovelace
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 1999

Walters v. Lovelace

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7525

BOBBY A. WALTERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

REBECCA S. LOVELACE, Magistrate District No. 1, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-2028-2-6AJ)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby A. Walters, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Bobby Walters appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Walters v. Lovelace, No. CA-98-2028-2-6AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con- tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.