U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Gupton

United States v. Gupton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 1999

United States v. Gupton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PHILLIP CARL GUPTON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-93-13, CA-98-296-BO)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Carl Gupton, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Phillip Carl Gupton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gupton, Nos. CR-93-13; CA-98-296-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.