U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Richardson v. Williams

Richardson v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 1999

Richardson v. Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7549

CARLTON RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

HUBERT WILLIAMS; ALTON ANDERSON, Dr.; SHIRLEY CLARK; M. L. PERRY, Defendants - Appellees, and

GRADY MASSEY, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-936-5-H)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Carlton Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v. Williams, No. CA-97-936-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.