U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Granger v. US Dept Agriculture

Granger v. US Dept Agriculture
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 1999

Granger v. US Dept Agriculture

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2633

FLOYD RANDOLPH GRANGER, III; MICHAEL GERARD GRANGER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; HAROLD F. ZORNIG, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-171-6-13AK)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Randolph Granger, III, Michael Gerard Granger, Appellants Pro Se. James D. McCoy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Granger v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. CA-98-171-6-13AK (D.S.C. Oct. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.