U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Ronald S. Tillman

United States v. Ronald S. Tillman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 1999

United States v. Ronald S. Tillman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RONALD S. TILLMAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-6)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald S. Tillman, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ronald S. Tillman appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Correction Sentence.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Tillman, No. CR-89-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.