U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Kubweza v. US Postal Service

Kubweza v. US Postal Service
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 1999

Kubweza v. US Postal Service

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1099

LINDIWE N. KUBWEZA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-504-3)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lindiwe N. Kubweza, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lindiwe N. Kubweza appeals the magistrate judge’s order dis- missing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the mag- istrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.* See Kubweza v. United States Postal Service, No. CA-98-504-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 636 (West 1993 & West Supp. 1998).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.