Johnson v. Lumbermens Mutual
Johnson v. Lumbermens Mutual
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1552
JOYCE JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, t/a Kemper National Services; EDWIN BOND, in his individ- ual capacity, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1128-A)
Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Joyce Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. John Christopher Pasierb, COHEN, GETTINGS & DUNHAM, Arlington, Virginia; Francis Xavier Grossi, Jr., BATES, MECKLER, BULGER & TILSON, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Joyce Johnson appeals a district court order granting the motion for judgment as a matter of law of her former employer, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., t/a Kemper National Services. The district court granted the motion at the close of her case to the jury in her action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed all of the claims Johnson raises in her informal brief and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Lumbermens Mutual, No. CA-97-1128-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.