U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. McKenzie

United States v. McKenzie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 1999

United States v. McKenzie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6025

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CORNELL AUGUSTUS MCKENZIE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429-A, CA-97-752-AM)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornell Augustus McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Cornell Augustus McKenzie seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying the motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See United States v. McKenzie, Nos. CR-91-429-A; CA-97-752-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 1998). We deny McKenzie’s motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.