Curtis v. Furnel
Curtis v. Furnel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6319
HERBERT CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
DOCTOR FURNEL, Psychiatrist, Ridgeland Correc- tional Institution, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-218-18AK)
Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Curtis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Herbert Curtis appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Curtis v. Furnel, No. CA-99-218-18AK (D.S.C. Mar. 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.