U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Whiting v. Lappin

Whiting v. Lappin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 4, 1999

Whiting v. Lappin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6018

REECE COLEMAN WHITING, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-689-5-BR)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reece Coleman Whiting, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Reece Coleman Whiting, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Whiting v. Lappin, No. CA-98-689-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.