U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Varner v. NC Attorney General

Varner v. NC Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 1999

Varner v. NC Attorney General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7632

DANNY RAY VARNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-35-1)

Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Ray Varner, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Danny Ray Varner seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s* order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the magistrate judge. See Varner v. North Carolina Att’y Gen., No. CA-98-35-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 1999).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.