U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Saunders

United States v. Saunders
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 1999

United States v. Saunders

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6258

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MICHAEL VERTOIN SAUNDERS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR- 96-204, CA-98-1493-DKC)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Vertoin Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Stuart A. Berman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael Vertoin Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders, Nos. CR-96-204; CA-98-1493-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.