United States v. Hamilton
United States v. Hamilton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7472
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
MICHAEL HAMILTON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-66, CA-97-1296)
Submitted: April 27, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Michael Hamilton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See United States v. Hamilton, Nos. CR-94-66; CA-97- 1296 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.