Bryant v. Lovin
Bryant v. Lovin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2798
AMY N. BRYANT; YVONNE O. BRYANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus
STEVE LOVIN; J. J. CAMPBELL; J. W. JACOBS, In- dividually and as a Deputy with Robeson County Sheriff’s Department, Lumberton, North Caro- lina; GLENN MAYNOR, Sheriff of Robeson County; TOMMY STRICKLAND, Lieutenant and Supervisor of the Drug Task Force of Robeson County Sher- iff’s Department, Lumberton, North Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-68-7-F)
Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amy N. Bryant, Yvonne O. Bryant, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Harrison Sasser, III, G. Christopher Olson, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Amy and Yvonne Bryant seek to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the Appellants’ action filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. We find that the Appellants’ allegations fail to rise to the level of constitutional violations.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Bryant v. Lovin, No. CA-98-68-7-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.