Andrews v. NC Attorney General
Andrews v. NC Attorney General
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6244
THOMAS LYNN ANDREWS, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-828-1)
Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Lynn Andrews, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Thomas Lynn Andrews, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reason- ing of the district court. See Andrews v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-97-828-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.