U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Sharp v. Virginia Parole Bd

Sharp v. Virginia Parole Bd
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 18, 1999

Sharp v. Virginia Parole Bd

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7327

STEPHEN A. SHARP, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1170-AM)

Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen A. Sharp, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Sharp v. Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA- 97-1170-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.